The
case of Edward Snowden is a situation still going on today. When
Snowden was young, he was not the best student, as he did not even
get a high school diploma. However, he talent and interest in
computing allowed him to gain a job at the CIA on IT security in 2007
and quickly rise up the ranks. In 2009, he left the CIA to join the
NSA. Over time, however, Snowden began to realize the true nature of
the U.S government and how much hidden surveillance it performed on
its citizens. As an employee of the NSA as well as the U.S
Government, he was able to see the various collections of data the
U.S government had gained from spying and surveying. Snowden noticed
how such actions deeply violated peoples' right of privacy as well as
their Fourth Amendment rights, protection against unwarranted and
unjustified searches. Sympathetic to the citizens of the United
States, he decided to leak out some of these documents, mainly those
from the surveillance program he had been working on, PRISM, in order
to show Americans what was truly happening in the American government
system (Wilmore 4).
His
action was met with various responses (Krumboltz 2) and opinions that
were quite close. In a poll, 59% of Americans found Snowden to be a
respectable hero, while the other 49% found him to be a traitor
(Raphael 4).Many citizens
were horrified by the fact that they were constantly spied and
surveyed on without their consent and considered Snowden a
whistleblower, or informant, or even to an extent, hero. The U.S
government officials obviously were not pleased about the idea of top
secret government plans being suddenly sent out to the public and
hurting their image. To the U.S government, their actions would have
had justification, as surveillance can help identify any signs of
terrorism or national danger. As a result, Snowden was be charged
with a sentence of 30 years for leaking confidential government. In
order to avoid this, Snowden fled to Hong Kong and later Russia.
Snowden originally had plans to later seek asylum from South American
countries such as Venezuela and Nicaragua; however, the U.S
government soon revoked his passport and travel documents, leaving
him stuck in Russia.
Snowden's
number one supporter through his whole case would be the secret
information distributor organization, Wikileaks. Despite the possible
risks, Wikileaks still supported Snowden all the way with his
actions, one action possibly being their common goals and views. This
was shown when Wikileaks covered his expenses in Hong Kong and when
Wikileaks member Sarah Harrison even accompanied Snowden from Hong
Kong to Moscow during his run. Since she aided Snowden, she could not
go back to her home in the United Kingdom, where she herself could
possibly be arrested, and had no choice but to live in exile in
Germany. When asked why she sacrificed so much, Harrison said,"For
future Snowdens, we want to show there is an organization that will
do what we did for Snowden — as much as possible — in raising
money for legal defense and public advocacy for whistleblowers so
they know if they come forward there is a support group for
them.”(Jay 1) It simply shows that Snowden most likely will not be
the only person who will leak federal information, and that there are
most likely any other people in the world with similar views as him.
In fact, it could be very likely that there are many people such as
Snowden who have committed similar “federal crimes” and went
unnoticed. If this were the case, is Snowden really the major issue
to be focused on? It could be very possible that his “traitorous”
acts aren't as extreme as they seem. His leaks tell us that the
government seizes the phone logs of millions of Americans without any
authority or warrant to do so, and that the NSA tracks user data from
large sites (Raphael 2). Generally speaking, the U.S government
betraying the very Constitution it promised to uphold. As Snowden
himself stated, “These programs don't make us more safe. They hurt
our economy. They hurt our country. They limit our ability to speak,
think, live, and to be creative.” (Raphael 3)
At
the same time, many people believe that Snowden is nothing more that
a traitor who committed a terrible act of treachery. By becoming a
worker of the U.S government, Snowden promised that he would
safeguard the nations' secrets the moment he was employed. By leaking
out some of the nation's important secrets, Snowden betrayed the
trust that the government gave him. Society is dependent on trust. If
all bankers, doctors, nurses, lawyers, and police officers were to
live without trust, the society would filled with a bunch of
individual sections where nobody can trust or help each other (Jay
14). According to successful millionaire Bill Gates, “I
think he broke the law, so I certainly wouldn't characterize him as a
hero. If he wanted to raise the issues and stay in the country and
engage in civil disobedience or something of that kind, or if he had
been careful in terms of what he had released, then it would fit more
of the model of 'OK, I'm really trying to improve things.' You won't
find much admiration from me
(Guarini
3). Snowden may have taken the extreme side of the issue by suddenly
revealing a portion of the nation's secret activities and attempting
to disappear soon afterward. By all means, there may have been a
better and more civilized option of trying to reform the govenment's
operations. Because of this, some people may consider Snowden to be a
coward for running away from his problem rather than being brave and
facing them directly. Snowden claims to use the power of the Internet
to expose
the corruption and wrong-doing of totalitarian regimes. However, he
has told us almost nothing about countries such as North Korea, Iran,
China, Cuba and Venezuela. Instead,
Snowden has spilled secrets from the countries that organize the
peacekeeping and humanitarian missions, combat nuclear proliferation,
champion human rights, fight terrorism and human trafficking, and
hold free and fair elections. His actions have undercut the major
world’s countries of freedom and given aid and comfort to the
world’s totalitarian regimes.
In
my opinion, Snowden is a hero. Casting away the fact that he
committed a “federal crime”, Snowden is no different from anyone
else. He is simply human. Humans are not perfect and can never have
every single person in the world on their side. There will always be
those who support him and those who oppose him. However, Snowden's
“crime” was for a good cause and had good intentions. He only
meant to help Americans regain some footing in the case of their own
natural right of privacy. Although Snowden may appear to be quite
cowardly for running away from his problems by traveling to foreign
states for safety an seeking asylum, he does face a thirty year
sentence in prison if he were to go back to the United States. As a
man in his early thirties, he would be sixty by the time he would be
able to leave, excluding the likely chance of long term probation or
any additional sentences. While Snowden may seem to be viewed as a
traitor and criminal by some, he was simply doing what he felt was
right. Sometimes we must defy authority in order to do what is truly
right, and what Snowden did may not necessarily be a hundred percent
wrong. In a way, he was simply exercising his freedom of speech, only
is a passive way. Through his actions of leaking the documents and
from what he said from the interviews, Snowden simply wanted to
express his belief that he felt what the government was doing was
wrong. Since the Constitution does guarantee freedom of speech,
Snowden may not have necessarily done something wrong.
Krumboltz,
Mike. "Is Edward Snowden a Traitor or a Hero? The Debate
Continues." Yahoo! News. Yahoo!, 17 Jan. 2014. Web. 6 Oct. 2014.
<http://news.yahoo.com/is-edward-snowden-a-traitor-or-a-hero--the-debate-continues-200122522.html>.
-Wilmore,
Kathy. "All Classroom Magazines." Hero or Traitor?
Scholastic, 17 Mar. 2014. Web. 06 Oct. 2014.
<http://magazines.scholastic.com/news/2014/03/Hero-or-Traitor>.
-Raphael,
Daniel. "Why Edward Snowden Is a Hero." The Huffington
Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 07 Nov. 2013. Web. 06 Oct. 2014.
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/daniel-raphael/why-edward-snowden-is-a-h_b_4227605.html>.
-"Yes,
Edward Snowden Is a Traitor." The Diplomat. N.p., n.d. Web. 04
Oct. 2014.
<http://thediplomat.com/2013/12/yes-edward-snowden-is-a-traitor/>.
-Jay,
James. "Snowden Is a Traitor in All but Name." The Heritage
Foundation. N.p., n.d. Web. 06 Oct. 2014.
<http://www.heritage.org/research/commentary/2014/1/snowden-is-a-traitor-in-all-but-name>.
-Goodman,
Amy, and Juan Gonzalez. "Exclusive: WikiLeaks Editor Sarah
Harrison on Helping Edward Snowden, Being Forced to Live in Exile."
Democracy Now! N.p., n.d. Web. 06 Oct. 2014.
<http://www.democracynow.org/2014/7/1/exclusive_wikileaks_editor_sarah_harrison_on>.
-"Profile:
Edward Snowden." BBC
News.
N.p., n.d. Web. 06 Oct. 2014.
<http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-22837100>.
-Stone,
Geoffrey R. "Edward Snowden: "Hero or Traitor"?" The
Huffington Post.
TheHuffingtonPost.com, 10 June 2013. Web. 06 Oct. 2014.
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/geoffrey-r-stone/edward-snowden-hero-or-tr_b_3418939.html>.
-Goyette,
Braden. "Edward Snowden Gets Permission To Stay In Russia For 3
More Years: Lawyer." The
Huffington Post.
TheHuffingtonPost.com, 07 Aug. 2014. Web. 05 Oct. 2014.
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/07/edward-snowden-russia_n_5657481.html?utm_hp_ref=edward-snowden>.
-"Statement
by Edward Snowden to Human Rights Groups at Moscow’s Sheremetyevo
Airport." Statement
by Edward Snowden to Human Rights Groups at Moscow’s Sheremetyevo
Airport.
Wikileaks, n.d. Web. 06 Oct. 2014.
<https://wikileaks.org/Statement-by-Edward-Snowden-to.html>.
-Guarini,
Drew. "Bill Gates: Edward Snowden Is No Hero." The
Huffington Post.
TheHuffingtonPost.com, 14 Mar. 2014. Web. 06 Oct. 2014.
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/14/bill-gates-snowden_n_4964311.html>.
-Edwards-Levy,
Ariel. "Americans Still Can't Decide Whether Edward Snowden Is A
'Traitor' Or A 'Hero,' Poll Finds." The
Huffington Post.
TheHuffingtonPost.com, 30 Oct. 2013. Web. 06 Oct. 2014.
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/30/edward-snowden-poll_n_4175089.html>.
Heyy Kristina,
ReplyDeleteI personally disagree with the stance that you took regarding Snowden due to the following reasons
1. I believe that although Snowden may bear good intention, as you've mentioned, he fails to help the US. By doing so, Snowden simply puts the US in danger by allowing NSA's targets to avoid surveillance and harms its relationship with its alliance.
I also believe that mass surveillance isn’t something so unjustified to an extend that it requires people like snowden to come up and “ do what is truly right”. In my opinion, mass surveillance is something that is necessary for the security of a nation. Without security, liberty and privacy can hardly be achieved.
I, however, was pretty convinced by how you justified Snowden’s running away. I’ve previously view Snowden as coward because he ran away from his sentence and punishment. Yet after reading your opinion, I changed my mind and started thinking that I would probably run away if I were Snowden.
Jasmine <33
Hey Kristina,
ReplyDeleteI totally agree with Snowden's choice to run away. However, I feel that Snowden did do wrong in revealing too much information about the NSA's hacking methods. I think the public deserved to know what the NSA was doing, not how it was doing thing. The information could aid adversaries in hiding from things.
http://mashable.com/2014/06/05/edward-snowden-revelations/